Boards Results

QCBC GNOT TEAMS - MATCH 3

Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: 0

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

5 RADKE Team 3 KEMPTHORNE Team 2 W 2S 7 100 1 -1

6 COLLINS Team 9 HALE Team 2 W 2S 9 110 -5 5

4 TRELOAR Team 2 FRANCIS Team 1 W 3C 7 80 1 -1

1 WARD Team 7 PERRIN Team 3 W 4S 8 100 5 -5

17 THOMSON Team 15 FERNON Team 2 W 4S 7 100 5 -5

15 FERNON Team 17 THOMSON Team 1 W 4S 7 80 -5 5

14 JENKINS Team 11 PAGE Team 2 W 4S 9 110 -5 5

10 SOLOMON Team 13 KENT Team 1NT W 4S 6 100 5 -5

11 PAGE Team 14 JENKINS Team 1 W 6C 6 100 5 -5

8 BEDI Team 16 EASTMAN Team 1NT E 6S 5 200 11 -11

2 FRANCIS Team 4 TRELOAR Team 2 N 9H 7 100 -1 1

9 HALE Team 6 COLLINS Team 1 N 9H 7 80 5 -5

7 PERRIN Team 1 WARD Team 3 N 9H 8 100 -5 5

3 KEMPTHORNE Team 5 RADKE Team 1 N 9H 7 80 -1 1

20 QUINN Team 19 BENNETT Team 1 W AD 8 110 -5 5

12 SCRIVENS Team 18 HALL Team 1 S AH 8 110 6 -6

19 BENNETT Team 20 QUINN Team 1 S AH 7 80 5 -5

16 EASTMAN Team 8 BEDI Team 3 S KH 6 300 -11 11

13 KENT Team 10 SOLOMON Team 2 W TC 9 110 -5 5

18 HALL Team 12 SCRIVENS Team 1 W TC 8 110 -6 6

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract Result Score Frequency
1NT by EW -2 200 1
1 by NS +1 110 1
3 by EW -1 100 1
2 by EW -1 100 2
1NT by EW -1 100 1
1 by EW -1 100 1
1 by NS = 80 2
1 by NS = 80 1
1 by EW = -80 2
2 by NS -1 -100 1
3 by NS -1 -100 1
2 by EW +1 -110 3
1 by EW +1 -110 2
3 by NS -3 -300 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
5 RADKE Team	3 KEMPTHORNE Team	2 W	2S	7	100		1	-1
6 COLLINS Team	9 HALE Team	2 W	2S	9		110	-5	5
4 TRELOAR Team	2 FRANCIS Team	1 W	3C	7		80	1	-1
1 WARD Team	7 PERRIN Team	3 W	4S	8	100		5	-5
17 THOMSON Team	15 FERNON Team	2 W	4S	7	100		5	-5
15 FERNON Team	17 THOMSON Team	1 W	4S	7		80	-5	5
14 JENKINS Team	11 PAGE Team	2 W	4S	9		110	-5	5
10 SOLOMON Team	13 KENT Team	1NT W	4S	6	100		5	-5
11 PAGE Team	14 JENKINS Team	1 W	6C	6	100		5	-5
8 BEDI Team	16 EASTMAN Team	1NT E	6S	5	200		11	-11
2 FRANCIS Team	4 TRELOAR Team	2 N	9H	7		100	-1	1
9 HALE Team	6 COLLINS Team	1 N	9H	7	80		5	-5
7 PERRIN Team	1 WARD Team	3 N	9H	8		100	-5	5
3 KEMPTHORNE Team	5 RADKE Team	1 N	9H	7	80		-1	1
20 QUINN Team	19 BENNETT Team	1 W	AD	8		110	-5	5
12 SCRIVENS Team	18 HALL Team	1 S	AH	8	110		6	-6
19 BENNETT Team	20 QUINN Team	1 S	AH	7	80		5	-5
16 EASTMAN Team	8 BEDI Team	3 S	KH	6		300	-11	11
13 KENT Team	10 SOLOMON Team	2 W	TC	9		110	-5	5
18 HALL Team	12 SCRIVENS Team	1 W	TC	8		110	-6	6

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
1NT by EW	-2	200	1
1 by NS	+1	110	1
3 by EW	-1	100	1
2 by EW	-1	100	2
1NT by EW	-1	100	1
1 by EW	-1	100	1
1 by NS	=	80	2
1 by NS	=	80	1
1 by EW	=	-80	2
2 by NS	-1	-100	1
3 by NS	-1	-100	1
2 by EW	+1	-110	3
1 by EW	+1	-110	2
3 by NS	-3	-300	1